Syllabus

What’s the International Baccalaureate Diploma Program (IBDP) and How Is Economics Assessed Within It?

Victor Tan
 

Sepupus, we’ve come to the last part of the focus of this website beyond which an open world lies. Here we are at the program that I did, the International Baccalaureate Diploma Program.

Of all the major pre-university programs, I think that this is probably one of the most misunderstood – But there are a couple of people out there whom you might not expect to have done it, but whose names you will recognize regardless.

Amongst others, you have Khairy Jamaluddin, who did his IB aeons ago (and who did an extended essay on FELDA, interestingly enough), as he discussed with me when we did our interview together last year…

Seen: A couple of (former) IB students just doing their thing. Books: Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s Malay Dilemma, and Anwar Ibrahim’s The Asian Renaissance.

And also… Kim Jong-un? The current supreme leader of North Korea, otherwise known as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who allegedly did his IB in Switzerland where the thing was actually conceived?

Well, maybe that’s just conventional wisdom or the results of a tabloid rag gone wow. But it would be fascinating to imagine him struggling over a HL math exam 😅

Anyway, IB is a globally recognized two-year educational framework tailored for students aged 16-19, and it is a little different from A levels which tend to go a lot more into depth into individual subjects in that it emphasizes holistic learning, international-mindedness, and developing inquiring people capable of critical thinking and responsible global citizenship – Which pretty much any IB student could easily tell you just means that we are extremely extremely good at BSing, but I’ll leave it to you to discover what’s true and what’s not.

If you’re doing the IB, maybe you can even make it into a TOK question.

You’re welcome.

Anyway…

Educational Philosophy of the IB Diploma Programme

Every educational organization has some sort of underpinning philosophy behind it, and the IB is no different. What it promised seemed a little more appealing to me at the time, though, and this is what it was.

You can also read this document here created by the IB if you are interested.

Didn’t read that? No problem – here are my thoughts and experiences.

I could say any number of woke things about the IB diploma, but I think that that’s a disservice to you, so I will just say my thoughts.

As I understand it, the International Baccalaureate (IB) is designed to be an international qualification. It was designed to be a curriculum that was interoperable, whichever international school you went to throughout the world, and it was designed with that explicit idea of broad focus and worldly scope in mind – To create something for the children of diplomats across the world so that whichever international school they went into, they would be able to just slot themselves in and just function, work, and do well.

To that end, students take six subjects which is meant to offer an education in breadth – three at what we call higher level and three at standard level. A higher level is roughly equivalent to an A level in terms of scope, while SLs are more analogous to AS exams. Also, there are a couple of interesting assessments, namely…

  • Theory of Knowledge (TOK), which explores the nature of knowledge and how we come to know what we know.
  • Extended Essay (EE), which involves an independent research project of 4000 words, fostering depth of inquiry.
  • Creativity, Activity, Service (CAS) encourages students to engage in extracurricular activities to nurture personal growth and community service.

Economics within the IB Diploma Programme

Now, this sets us out to understand economics within the IB Diploma.

Economics within the IB DP focuses not only on economic theories and models but also on their real-world application, ethical implications, and societal impacts, and with an eye towards internationalism.

Curriculum and Content

Economics students at both Higher Level (HL) and Standard Level (SL) study four core units:

  • Introduction to Economics: We study foundational principles and economic thinking, Leading from scarcity into the principles of economics.
  • Microeconomics: We study individual market behaviors, supply-demand analysis, and market failures, amongst other things.
  • Macroeconomics: national economies, policy-making, and economic indicators like GDP, GDP per capita, as well as phenomena that affect the macro economy, i.e., the economies of countries, such as inflation and the interest rate, and how all this affects the aggregate behavior of consumers.
  • The Global Economy: international trade, economic integration, sustainable development, and economic growth.

As with Economics at IGCSE and A level, understanding content knowledge is important, but so is the ability to analyze and to evaluate, although the topics may be slightly different or the emphasis somewhat shifted. We will talk a little bit more about this later on.

The difference between SL and HL in terms of content is that HL goes much more into depth. For example, in HL economics, students go deep into the Theory of the Firm and into cost curves amongst other things, the Marshall-Lerner condition, and a lot more depth in terms of discussions and understanding of economic theory. Also, there is an explicit focus on policy analysis and evaluation which is manifested in paper 3 which is only available for HL students.

📚 IB Economics Assessment Structure: HL vs SL

STANDARD LEVEL (SL)

🔸 Internal Assessment (30%)

  • Content: Three commentaries (800 words each) based on real-world news articles. This will probably be a big source of your suffering throughout the course, and I will talk more about it later on.
  • Coverage: One each for microeconomics, macroeconomics, and global economics.
  • Assessment method: Internally marked, externally moderated. What this means in practice is that all of you will be working with your economics teachers to craft and create your commentaries. In most schools, you will have the chance to have your teacher look over a draft one time so that you can receive comments before having to submit the final.

    What typically happens is that the teacher will assign grades to every single person, and IB won’t be checking every single assignment for marking. Rather, what they do is choose one or two commentaries from the entire cohort, compare what they personally would grade the IAS against the teacher’s grade, and then from there try to understand how the school is doing.

    If the school grades the commentary very leniently and assigns it a perfect score when in reality it should have only deserved a 5, then this raises an alarm bell that tells us that the school is too lenient and therefore all other students should be treated as such.

🔸 External Assessment (70%)

  • Paper 1 (Essay-based) – Extended analytical and evaluative responses, requiring critical thinking and deep synthesis across economic theories. Basically, you need to bring out your analysis and evaluation skills here alongside your understanding of real-world examples. By this point, I hope that you’ve read a lot and have taken the effort to learn about the world around you, countries around you, and economic decisions and how they impact the world around you.
  • Paper 2 (Data-response) – Application and analysis of data sets to examine economic concepts practically.
PaperTypeTimeDescriptionWeight
1Extended Response1 hour 15 minChoose one question from three. Each question has part (a) and part (b).30%
2Data Response1 hour 45 minChoose one question from two. Based on real-world case study extracts.40%

🕒 Total Examination Time: 3 hours
📘 Syllabus Coverage: Core syllabus only (units 1–4)


HIGHER LEVEL (HL)

🔹 Internal Assessment (20%)

  • Content: Same as SL — three 800-word commentaries from different syllabus sections.
  • Assessment method: Internally marked, externally moderated – Same as before.

🔹 External Assessment (80%)

  • Paper 1 and 2 – Same as for SL.
  • Paper 3 (Policy paper) – A specialized assessment exclusively for HL, focusing explicitly on policy evaluation and synthesis.
PaperTypeTimeDescriptionWeight
1Extended Response1 hour 15 minSame structure as SL — one out of three essays (two parts each)20%
2Data Response1 hour 45 minSame as SL — one out of two case-based questions30%
3Policy Analysis1 hour 45 minAnswer two compulsory questions — includes mathematical calculations.30%

🕒 Total Examination Time: 4 hours 45 minutes
📗 Syllabus Coverage: Core + HL extensions (includes more advanced theory and quantitative work)


🎯 Summary: SL vs HL

FeatureSLHL
Papers2 (P1 & P2)3 (P1, P2, P3)
Internal Assessment30%20%
Quantitative Paper✅ (Paper 3)
SyllabusCore topics onlyCore + HL extensions
Total Exam Duration3 hours4 hours 45 minutes
University PreparationModerateStrong (especially for economics/finance)

Philosophy and Practical Differences between HL and SL

HL Economics aims to prepare students rigorously for university-level economics study. It provides deeper theoretical foundations, more extensive analytical challenges, and greater demands for synthesis and evaluation. The additional HL-exclusive policy paper reflects this heightened focus.

SL Economics, while rigorous, is tailored for students seeking a strong but general understanding of economics. It balances foundational theory with practical applications suitable for students whose higher education or career aspirations lie in diverse fields beyond economics itself.

Similarities and the Unique Contribution of the IB

Regardless of whether you are taking SL or HL economics, it’s a good bet that you will be expected to:

  • Read widely
  • Manage your time extremely well because of the multiple other assignments and subjects you are dealing with
  • Be able to comment intelligently and link things together across different areas of the syllabus
  • Make good observations about what’s suitable

One of the reasons why the IB happens to be one of the most expensive pre-university programs that a person can undertake is because of the high labor intensity of this kind of engagement, whereby teachers have to often deal with entire cohorts of students on a personal basis to provide feedback to every single student in the course of their journey, which is not easy by any means and entails a large amount of work.

I consider it a very rewarding programme, but let me go ahead and tell you that it really isn’t for everyone, because it’s not an easy programme and if you don’t choose the right school, you will suffer because of the way the curriculum is structured and because of how much contact time and therefore collaboration you as a student will need to have with your teachers.

I know some of you will read this and you will say that you want a more rigorous education – Well that was exactly what I wanted; let me not overly praise or mock my teachers, but let me just say that it would be fair to say that I went on to hard mood. And up until now I still don’t know whether I can justify it.

To that, I can say the following: Be careful what you wish for because you may actually receive it.

…Then again, you’re here reading Sepupunomics, are you not? Well… Enjoy your masochism then, I guess.😂

Alright, sepupus, that’s enough for today, and I will see you in the next one!

The Importance of Mark Schemes for Economics Exams (IGCSE, A Levels, IB Diploma Program)

Victor Tan
 

Hello, sepupus?

Do you like doing well on exams? Does that er, maximize your utility?

Well, listen up.

Mark schemes are crucial for getting those sweet, sweet, beautiful marks in your Economics (or pretty much any other) exams, whether IGCSE, A Levels, IB, or pretty much anything else — If you’re wondering why I specifically said good at economics exams, just ask yourself: Does being good at economics exams immediately or directly mean that you are good at thinking as an economist? That’s an interesting question, but what’s for sure is this:

If you cannot do well in economics exams, it is very unlikely that somehow or another you are secretly a truly incredible economist. And with that in mind, exams as tests are crucial and it is entirely possible to get higher marks if we understand how those marks are given out.

Here is where mark schemes come in, not just for examiners, but for students who want to excel.

Here’s why!


🎯 1. They Reveal the Target

Mark schemes tell you exactly what the examiner is looking for. Economics is not just about writing something that’s “kind of correct.” It’s about hitting specific keywords, concepts, and logical chains that the examiner has been told to reward.

For example, if the question is:

Explain two reasons why a firm may benefit from economies of scale.

The mark scheme might expect:

  • One valid type of economy of scale (e.g. purchasing, managerial)
  • A clear explanation of how it reduces average cost

Vague answers like “the firm grows” don’t get marks—even if they’re sort of true; each exam has specific criteria and conditions under which marks can be procured. And if you don’t try to understand them or actually work with the real marking documents in the first place, there’s a very high chance that you will just end up concluding that exams are unfair. The system was rigged against you and you didn’t have a chance when actually it was your own fault for not seeking out this important resource.

Also, understanding the syllabus and assessment objectives is one thing and it’s nice to have and it’s good to have that understanding, but you also need mark schemes; mark schemes offer you concrete and hard reasons as to why a particular answer is correct and will give you a valuable picture of what is correct for the exam that you happen to be taking.


🧠 2. They Train You to Think Like an Examiner

By reading mark schemes, you begin to internalize the examiner’s mindset. You learn to:

  • Structure your responses in logical steps (e.g. define → apply → analyze)
  • Avoid waffle
  • Anticipate the level of depth required for questions
  • Sympathize with examiners and imagine what it would be like if you were actually forced to evaluate other people.

This is especially useful in data-response questions or evaluation-based questions, where many students lose marks by either over-explaining or under-developing points.

A little bit more on this. You should try as a student or a parent to understand how an examiner thinks.

It is very worthwhile to do this.

Consider that an examiner wants to reward you for sharing your knowledge and ask yourself what the examiner needs to know in order to give you credit for your answers – They are not here to harm you or to trip you up immediately. Rather, they are performing a very important role in deciding who should be given credit and how they should determine who are the wheat and who are the chaff within the exam cohort. To separate out clearly who are the best – the ones who are good and the ones who unfortunately do not make the cut.

This logic is not exclusive to examiners. If you were to think about it long enough, you might see that there is a societal need for this kind of differentiating behavior, and you might in turn see that at some point, you might have to make the same decisions as well. So, be an examiner for the day, and think about what you would be looking for if you were in their position. It will be valuable for you.


📝 3. They Teach You the Language of Economics

Mark schemes highlight the specific terminology that Cambridge values. Using the correct economic language (e.g. “opportunity cost,” “price elasticity of demand,” “allocation of resources”) can make the difference between a 5 and an 8.

Having examples in front of you will make it very much easier for you to get used to using that language across all future situations, and make it so you don’t just start waffling out things that people won’t understand. It’s not about infinite creativity across a span of things that are ultimately not relevant. Rather, it is about being able to use the language in the common world that you are studying and being able to make use of it in the most effective, well-reasoned ways. Language is not merely about sounding pretty. It is also about being effective. And the mark schemes tell you very clearly what is effective, even if you may have to interpret them and may need good examples (hint: Join Premium!).


🧩 4. They Help You Understand Assessment Objectives

Each question in Economics (IGCSE and A Levels) is mapped to certain Assessment Objectives (AOs) like:

  • AO1: Knowledge and understanding
  • AO2: Application and analysis
  • AO3: Evaluation

Mark schemes show how each of these is rewarded. So if a question is AO3-heavy, you must evaluate—e.g. by weighing alternatives, recognizing limitations, or giving reasoned judgments. Understanding how the assessment objectives work in conjunction with what the mark schemes offer is highly helpful, especially when you have a good teacher or tutor on hand who is able to help you identify the deeper patterns that lie within.

The same is true for the International Baccalaureate as well, which in turn has its own dynamics – for example, knowledge and understanding of economic theories, application analysis, synthesis, and evaluation in Papers 1 and 2, and accuracy of calculations in Paper 3; almost every IB student also probably has nightmares about the rubrics for the extended essay and also for the commentaries that they have to produce as part of a portfolio throughout their entire career.

The IB has its own ways of assessing what is a good IB economics essay, and we’ll talk more about that soon even as I begin to provide and articulate examples that will come out in this website.

But the basic point is this: it doesn’t matter what curriculum it is – you need to find out how you will be marked in order to understand the broader goals of what you’re being taught to do, and you need not just to have that broad overview of the picture or the direction in which things are going but also need a very clear understanding of how things are evaluated on the more granular levels, whatever exam you are taking.


    📊 5. They Are a Study Tool in Themselves

    Mark schemes let you reverse-engineer good answers. When practicing past papers, you can:

    • Compare your answer to the mark scheme
    • Spot missing points or overcomplicated explanations
    • Learn what earns marks and what doesn’t

    It’s one of the most efficient ways to improve.

    The reason for this is that you want to make sure that you are hitting the right notes, and the mark scheme is basically a source of truth for you. The more you compare your answers to mark schemes and the more you become able to produce answers that hit the correct note, the higher the marks you will get in your exams as compared to what you would have gotten if you had not seen the mark schemes in the first place.


    ✅ Summary

    Mark schemes aren’t just tools for checking your score—they’re guides for mastering the exam. If past papers are the questions, mark schemes are the answer key to success. Learn their logic, adopt their style, and you’ll write answers that the examiner wants to reward.

    They are your keys to the kingdom of economics heaven. Or if you are not religious, then to the mansion. The luxury car or to the dream holiday destination where you can meditate beyond the confines and constraints of banal human life into the higher reaches of a more beautiful universe.

    Take your mark schemes friends and use them as a part of your strategy. Don’t listen to me tell you this over and over again. Reading what I say and hearing me tell you things is only going to get you so far. You can have all the premium resources that you want, but you must use them. You must be proactive, and you must take your learning into your own hands. It is an honor to be a part of your journey, but you are far from done. Go further and farther, and if you want to thank me, do it after you succeed.

    I look forward to hearing your stories!

    What’s In A Syllabus? A-Level Economics (9708) VS IGCSE Economics (0455)

    Victor Tan
     

    Hello Sepupus!

    Not all of you are IGCSE students.

    In fact, some of you are further along the journey – you might be taking A Level economics, doing an IB program, struggling through your H2 Economics classes while you pass through Raffles, slogging through Olympiad questions for the International Economics Olympiad

    And some of you are just weirdos who are not even taking any of these curricula and are just here to read to learn and to absorb voraciously.

    Well, you’re in the right place – Share this with a friend who needs to know about this, who hasn’t learned about it. Help them help you to help yourselves to succeed together!

    With that in mind, the real target of this post is those of you who are thinking about studying economics beyond the IGCSE, those of you who want to know the differences before you even set out on the IGCSE or even choose that pathway.

    And that’s why, right here and right now, we’re going to talk about a syllabus one step up from the Cambridge IGCSE Economics – The Cambridge A Level economics, subject code 9708.

    Let’s go!

    A-Level economics is one step further along than IGCSE economics, and it takes place at a different educational level and a higher level of advancement. In fact, it is at the same level as the International Baccalaureate Diploma Program, or the IB, which I’ll talk about in future posts.

    While IGCSE economics is catered towards students who are at the high school level, A-level economics is for students who are taking pre-university programmes, which means that this is what they’ll be studying right before they apply for admission to universities; as such, it makes sense that the subject trains the specific skills that students are supposed to have when they enter university:

    The ability to analyse, to evaluate, to make choices, to make judgements on the basis of data, and to confidently present that judgment, demonstrating that you are a good fit for good universities, and will make wonderful use of the resources that you can get at the world’s best schools (if that’s what you’re aiming for!), or scholarship resources from your countries or governments as your academic career forms an investment thesis.


    📘 From IGCSE to A Level: A Whole New Economic Ballgame

    As with the IGCSE, you shouldn’t purely rely on what a blog or a website tells you and you should always consider official resources and syllabi. With that in mind, here are some links to the official Cambridge A Level Economics 9708 syllabi… And here’s what the Cambridge A Levels syllabus (right) looks like compared to the IGCSE syllabus (left).


    If you are not doing Cambridge A-levels, then find the syllabus that is relevant to you, whether it is AQA, OCR, or whatever syllabus it is that you happen to be dealing with, and you can consider the differences across educational levels.

    Anyway, in this case, I’m using the 2026-2028 syllabus for A-levels and the 2027-2029 syllabus for IGCSE.

    Now, what are the differences?

    I suppose you would probably come up and start thinking that A-Levels is obviously harder than IGCSE Economics. But here are two very important points that I need to make right at the outset:

    1. A-Levels Economics is more complex but it is not a continuation of IGCSE Economics. A Levels are designed as a first-principles, university-preparatory course — not a continuation of IGCSE, but a foundational reintroduction to economics at a more abstract, analytical, and evaluative level.
    2. You do not need to have taken IGCSE Economics in order to take A-Levels Economics, and in fact, many people do not – Although the learning curve will be much steeper if you don’t do so.

    The aims of the A Level syllabus reflect this:

    “To read critically, express ideas clearly using data and diagrams, analyse problems, and appreciate how economists study the world — with a view to further study and real-world engagement.”

    You will soon realize when you look at A Level exams and textbooks that you are NOT just describing supply and demand or memorizing what a PPC is. At A Levels, you are:

    • Judging whether a government policy will lead to unintended consequences.
    • Evaluating how ethical concerns intersect with economic efficiency.
    • Developing the intellectual habits of an economist.

    🧠 Real Life Dilemmas and Situational Analyses

    Both syllabi emphasize these powerful conceptual anchors.

    • Scarcity and choice
    • The margin and decision-making
    • Equilibrium and disequilibrium
    • Time (short-run vs long-run)
    • Efficiency and inefficiency
    • The role of government and equity
    • Progress and development

    But it is fair to say that IGCSE economics emphasizes and teaches reasoning about causal chains and cause-and-effect relationships and in turn asks students to critically evaluate why things have happened, but the level of analysis required is different. That is because of…


    🧱 Layered Complexity

    Consider this table. Read it carefully, and you will understand a little bit more about the differences in complexity displayed across these two curricula.

    As you can see, IGCSE content covers the same broad topics as A-levels, but the A-levels take them to a brand new level of complexity that is much more difficult and much more evaluative – it is a subset of the A Levels syllabus, with much greater simplicity.

    In A Levels, you build on what you know, never leaving it behind, but dive much more deeply into a lot of different topics, such as the theory of the firm, utility maximization, indifference curves, and plenty of different ways of understanding externalities – how to resolve them and deal with analysis of situations on a much higher level and have thus to rely upon what you really know about the world from your wider and external reading suffused with an understanding of economics.

    We haven’t even gotten into the world of empirical data, econometrics, natural experiments, experimental economics, behavioral economics, research on institutions, and everything else, which are NOT in A Levels…

    But you can see here that at A Level, a stronger foundation is being built, and that if the IGCSE was merely the tip of the iceberg, A-Levels is a part of the tip that is deeper down.


    📊 The Papers: How You’ll Be Assessed

    Anyway, already, I think you can very clearly understand that A-Levels is more intense than IGCSE.

    The IGCSE economics papers are done in the course of just one multiple choice paper and a subjective paper (Paper 2).

    For the A-Levels, you have AS and also the A2 exams, each of which contributes 50% towards a student’s overall grade.

    A-Levels consists of two sets of multiple choice papers on significantly more complex and analysis-heavy questions, as well as actual data response and essay questions. Here’s a breakdown below.

    PaperLevelFormatTimeFocus%
    P1ASMultiple Choice1 hourAS content33% AS / 17% A Level
    P2ASData Response + Essays2 hoursMicro & Macro essays67% AS / 33% A Level
    P3A LevelMultiple Choice1 hr 15mAll content— / 17% A Level
    P4A LevelData Response + Unstructured Essays2 hoursAdvanced micro & macro— / 33% A Level

    Notice something interesting: essay questions become unstructured at A Level, and your ability to evaluate becomes the hallmark of excellence.

    At this level, examiners require you to make use of real-world examples that you have gained from reading the news, becoming aware about the world and developing, refining and articulating your knowledge through your own experiences of becoming aware about the world and intentionally choosing to learn about it.

    Naturally, this then brings us into looking at the assessment objectives.


    🎯 Assessment Objectives: The Weight of Thinking

    For Cambridge A Levels and Cambridge IGCSE Economics, the assessment objectives are the same.

    However, the way that they are weighted across the syllabi is different and reflects the different emphases of the exams. This is worth thinking about in detail.

    Here is a detailed comparison table that shows you how these differences play out and that will guide you in the direction that you need to grow in.

    This means that beyond the IGCSE, just knowing facts and how to deal with simple cause-and-effect scenarios is not enough. You must…

    • Analyze cause and effect on a much more sophisticated level and in novel situations.
    • Recognize assumptions and be able to challenge them.
    • Debate pros and cons, evaluating your choices across the short and long term, consider the roles of stakeholders. Question yourself and the basis upon which you make judgements.
    • Justify your conclusions and why you believe them effectively.

    However, it’s not just about right answers, and the notion of right answers may not necessarily even apply here. It is certainly, however, about sound reasoning.

    🧠 Tangible Differences between A Level and IGCSE Economics Questions

    Let’s now have a look at tangible and specific ways in which IGCSE economics questions differ from A-levels economics questions. I’ll give you a couple of examples here.


    🧮 1. Demand and Supply

    IGCSE (0455):

    Explain two causes of an increase in demand for a product. (4 marks)
    Analyse how an increase in demand affects equilibrium price and quantity. (6 marks)

    A Level (9708):

    A government plans to intervene in the housing market by setting a maximum price below the market equilibrium.
    Discuss the likely effects of this policy on the housing market and evaluate whether it will be effective in improving access to housing. (20marks)

    🧠 Difference:

    • IGCSE isolates one concept: shifts in demand.
    • A Level embeds demand/supply into policy, consequences, and effectiveness, and expects:
      • Use of diagrams
      • Application of theory
      • Judgment about outcomes
      • Recognition of unintended effects

    💰 2. Elasticity

    IGCSE:

    Explain what is meant by price elasticity of demand and identify two factors that affect it. (4 marks)
    Analyse how knowledge of PED might help a business when setting prices. (6 marks)

    A Level:

    A firm faces price inelastic demand for its product but operates in a competitive market.
    Evaluate the extent to which price elasticity of demand is useful for business decision-making in such a market. (20 marks)

    🧠 Difference:

    • IGCSE = define, list, and apply simply.
    • A Level = explore limitations, contextual relevance, and market structure interactions.

    🏦 3. Government Policy / Market Failure

    IGCSE:

    Identify two types of market failure. (2 marks)
    Explain how a government could correct the market failure caused by pollution. (6 marks)

    A Level:

    Governments sometimes use taxation to deal with negative externalities such as pollution.
    Evaluate whether taxation is the most effective way to deal with this type of market failure. (20 marks)

    🧠 Difference:

    • A Level requires:
      • Critical comparison (e.g., tax vs regulation)
      • Use of real-world context
      • Diagram(s) showing welfare loss used to analyze situations under the expectation that the student can choose what they are going to show with the diagram at hand.
      • Balanced conclusion

    🌍 4. International Trade and Globalisation

    IGCSE:

    Explain two reasons why countries trade with each other. (4 marks)
    Analyse the impact of tariffs on consumers and producers. (6 marks)

    A Level:

    Countries often face conflicting objectives in trade policy: protecting domestic industries vs encouraging free trade.
    Discuss the likely effects of imposing a tariff on imports, and evaluate whether it achieves its intended policy goals. (25 marks) – Note that 25 mark questions are AQA.

    🧠 Difference:

    • IGCSE focuses on direct cause-effect.
    • A Level examines trade-offs, political economy, and long-term consequences. Students are expected to debate, not just describe. Multiple-choice questions require analysis, deeper understanding, and ability to reason through multiple steps of thinking rather than (relative) surface-level understanding.

    📈 5. Inflation & Unemployment (Macroeconomics)

    IGCSE:

    Define inflation. (2 marks)
    Analyse one cause of inflation and one possible consequence. (6 marks)

    A Level:

    Consider the policy trade-off between reducing unemployment and controlling inflation.
    Evaluate whether a government should prioritise price stability or full employment. (25 marks)

    🧠 Difference:

    • A Level questions are structured around dilemma and judgment — this mimics real-world policymaking.
    • A-level questions often require you to put in examples and have an awareness of specific case studies from your own personal reading that you can immediately talk about in relation to.

    🧠 How to Succeed at A Level Economics

    As we can see, A Levels Economics is not really trivial. The vast majority of people who are just reading this piece with no prior experience with economics probably will not have thought as deeply as the average A Levels Economics student because they have never specifically directed their attentions towards this task.

    Of course, I’m not saying that you need to have taken the subject in order to succeed or to know more compared to someone who has taken the A Levels because experience makes a difference. But it is certainly true that in order to be able to do well at this subject under the constraints of assessment and evaluation that exist out there, there are certain things that you may have to do.

    ✅ Read widely. Think deeply.

    Use The Economist, IMF blogs, real data — and connect them to your syllabus. You will definitely need content and examples to do well in the essay questions and to be able to cite things that end up making sense – not only from your formal learning or from reading a textbook over and over again until kingdom come. You need insight about the real world. Read widely, read far, and become good at understanding that you can learn from everywhere there is to learn from and under any circumstance, and should also make a point of choosing to learn under any circumstance.

    Don’t necessarily think that you are going to learn everything or even the best of the things that you will learn about merely from learning essay structures or specific frameworks in which to do questions. Those are important and we will also talk about them extensively on this blog, but they are not the only thing.

    ✅ Practise essays often.

    Structured argumentation is your strongest weapon, but so is familiarizing yourself with the actual format of the papers, understanding honestly how well you can deal with the real exam and with the real challenges that are in front of you rather than how good you feel on a given day about your ability to take an exam. It is not just about what you take in, but also what you output and how well you can refine the process of outputting which requires practice, no ifs and no buts, with real exam materials.

    Feeling that you are good at something and actually being good at it are not the same thing. Don’t end up deceiving yourself.

    ✅ Read good essays.

    Having good examples in front of you is going to be crucial to understand what excellence looks like, but so is forming the patterns in your head about why something is good.

    That’s why there will be sample essays available to those of you with premium memberships – a perfect tool for you to learn a little more about how to deal with essay questions, potential lines of argument and what makes up a good and well-reasoned response.

    These are not merely for you to memorize and copy: That’s not going to work.

    However, it is for you to look at the patterns in thinking and to understand how to integrate effective or useful patterns of thinking into your own writing.

    But also want to understand how we deal with uncertainty, qualify our answers, and ultimately manage to achieve what the mark schemes set out for us but also what the needs of excellence dictate that we should do. Not only relying upon what other people say or what Sepupunomics says, but also what we individually think of our work as human beings.

    ✅ Master diagrams and definitions, but also the why.

    Memorizing diagrams is really not going to help you if all you can do is just remember vaguely how the diagram looks. Sure, you can get points for labeling axes, titling, drawing arrows, and highlighting shifts, but you need to understand the why.

    Why does this work? Why is this particular shift justified? Why is it to the right and not to the left? Could something else have happened? Could I have used something else in my analysis? Why this particular thing?

    Of course, even if you are an IGCSE student, having an awareness that this is what you need to be thinking about is valuable and meaningful as well, and the sooner you develop this skill, the better.

    If you are currently reading this, I hope that you are taking some notes – It will be funny if you can beat the average A-level student or even the best by the time you enter high school. If you think that that could be interesting or funny, you should actually try to do it. Just make sure to tag me later on Instagram or something, and I’ll happily celebrate you as a testament to success and an inspiration for everyone here.

    ✅ Get used to uncertainty.

    Many A Level questions are “To what extent…” — there’s no single answer.

    Be comfortable with coming up with judgments on the basis of your reasoning and your thinking, with a realization that:

    • Cause and effect can exist.
    • Certain things can be true only under very specific circumstances.
    • Those circumstances may not be the case in the long run if assumptions are violated.
    • In the real world, changes in circumstances can alter the entire balance of things.
    • Regardless of the fact that certain things can only be true under certain circumstances and those circumstances may not hold, you need to be able to be comfortable speaking about uncertainty and making statements that are true given what we do know – Not running away from uncertainty, trying to collapse it into certainty that doesn’t exist. Forming pools of black where there once was grey or white after you’ve decided to get rid of black.

    🧑‍🏫 Final Thought for Sepupus

    The level of expectation for IGCSE students and A-Level students is different, but you don’t need to be bound by those things. In fact, some of you may not even be taking either one of these curricula and you might not even be taking the IB either. All of this could be new to you and you are just going through the post reading them one after another and observing what is coming through them.

    If you are starting to get the sense that I recognize that the distinctions across the different syllabi are artificial and limiting in nature, you are on the right track. That is certainly how I think.

    However, it is also a fact that it is true that certain curricula are tailored to people of lower ages because they are calibrated to what is reasonable for a person to develop statistically speaking by a certain age.

    But then you are here reading Sepupunomics. Are you an ordinary person? Well, you could give an idealistic answer, an inflated answer that puts you at the center of the universe, or a realistic answer that is reflective of your level of ability. It doesn’t really matter to me because we are all on a journey forward.

    I will say this though, in the context of IGCSE vs the A-levels.

    Where the IGCSE syllabus hands you the map, the A Level syllabus tells you to chart the terrain, make choices, and justify your path. It trains your brain to better explore both the beauty and the mess of the real world, And assesses you on the paths, the destinations, and the journeys that you will take along the way, how beautiful they are, how filled with the sights and wonders that you would have gained from your reading, understanding, and comprehension of the wider world.

    But you don’t need to be doing A-levels in order to experience any of that. You only need to have the will to go forward on the journey and to go on it. Trust the process, and you may go further and farther than you may have thought possible.

    See you in the next post, sepupus!