Premium Reports

Lee Kuan Yew: Founding “CEO” of Singapore Inc.

Victor Tan
 

Hello and welcome back! In this premium report, you’ll learn about Lee Kuan Yew, who in an alternate history could very well have become Prime Minister of Malaysia. But that was not to be, and he was the founding Prime Minister of Singapore instead. In this premium report, you will get to hear about his story and journey his legacy.

From Third World to First – An Economic Vision Realized

Lee Kuan Yew is revered as the founding father of modern Singapore, the man who transformed a tiny port city with no natural resources into one of the world’s richest and most developed nations. When Singapore became independent in 1965, its prospects looked bleak – per capita GDP was roughly $500, on par with countries like Ghana(review.brunswickgroup.com). Yet within a generation Singapore had vaulted into the ranks of high-income nations, even surpassing its former colonial ruler in prosperity. Under Lee’s leadership, the country’s GDP per capita grew almost 15-fold in real terms from 1960 to 2013(livemint.com). By the early 21st century, Singapore’s income per person exceeded $50,000 – higher than that of Sweden – prompting observers to dub its rise the “economic miracle”(review.brunswickgroup.com). This dramatic ascent, often called the Great Singapore Miracle, was no accident; it was the result of deliberate policies and institution-building that Lee set in motion.

Lee Kuan Yew served as Prime Minister for over three decades (1959–1990), during which he laid out an architecture for nation-building that would turn a vulnerable post-colonial city into a thriving global hub. He identified five key pillars for Singapore’s success: political stability, quality education, attracting investment, rising living standards, and strong security(nlb.gov.sg). 

Throughout his tenure, his government made strides in each of these areas. Lee built a stable, trusted government almost from scratch – a feat in itself given the turbulent conditions of the 1950s and 60s. He cultivated public confidence in Singapore’s institutions and future, often saying that the people’s trust and unity were vital ingredients of the nation’s success(exploringculturaldatablog.wordpress.com). Investors and citizens alike came to believe in the Singapore story, enabling bold long-term plans to take root. This bedrock of confidence allowed Lee to implement tough but forward-looking economic decisions that fueled growth for decades.

Meritocracy, Elitism and Technocratic Leadership

A core tenet of Lee Kuan Yew’s governance philosophy was meritocracy – the conviction that a country must be led by its ablest people, chosen on talent and performance rather than connections or race. “Singapore is a meritocracy. And these men have risen to the top by their own merit, hard work and high performance,” Lee declared in 1971, referring to the cadre of officials and professionals guiding the young nation(nas.gov.sg). He prided himself on assembling a “closely-knit and coordinated hard core” of top talent in government, stating that the fate of millions depended on the “quality, strength and foresight” of these key figures(nas.gov.sg). This emphasis on elite talent led to the recruitment of scholars and experts into politics and the civil service, turning the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) into a highly educated, technocratic team. Lee himself would later reflect that his “greatest satisfaction” was “mustering the will to make this place meritocratic, corruption-free and equal for all races – and that it will endure beyond me.”(time.com)

But not all that was said about him was beautiful and rosy.

To view this content, please sign up for a membership!

If you haven’t signed up yet, make sure to Join Now!
Already a member? Log in here

Petronas: Malaysia’s Historical Cash Cow

Victor Tan
 

Sepupus, not every company in Malaysia can be called the literal cash cow of the country, but that’s effectively what Petronas is. 

It is one of the single largest sources of finance in Malaysia, providing vital funds, jobs, and resources to Malaysia through its contributions in the form of tax revenues, dividends, and various other sources of finance – it is also an important source of discretionary finance in Malaysia, given the fact that it is controlled extensively by the government of Malaysia and the Prime Minister of the country.

But just how large and how important is it? 

In this premium report, accessible to our premium members or purchasable as an individual copy right over here, we will dive deep into that question. Let’s go!

Petronas: History and Symbolism

Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) was established in 1974 under the Petroleum Development Act, which vested all of Malaysia’s oil and gas resources in this new national company(en.wikipedia.org). Petronas was formed to assert national control over petroleum reserves (which had been dominated by foreign firms like Shell) and to spearhead Malaysia’s oil & gas exploration, production, and development(theimpactlawyers.com)(iseas.edu.sg). 

Over the decades, Petronas grew into a fully integrated multinational oil and gas company with operations in over 100 countries(en.wikipedia.org), becoming a pillar of Malaysia’s economic development and a source of national pride – as of 2021 it was Malaysia’s sole Fortune Global 500 company(iseas.edu.sg). 

Petronas’ success is visibly etched in Malaysia’s skyline and infrastructure: oil revenues funded iconic projects like the Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur (once the world’s tallest buildings), the development of the new administrative capital Putrajaya, and the Kuala Lumpur International Airport(iseas.edu.sg). These projects underscore how pivotal Petronas has been in transforming Malaysia’s infrastructure and advancing its economic ambitions.

Beyond symbolism, Petronas has been a key enabler of Malaysia’s economy and public finances(iseas.edu.sg). The oil and gas sector (with Petronas at the helm) has long contributed substantially to Malaysia’s export earnings and GDP(iseas.edu.sg). Critically, Petronas has also been a financial lifeline for the government – often helping to “bail out” or support troubled firms and budgets when called upon(iseas.edu.sg). 

For example, Petronas profits were used in the 1980s to rescue a failing bank and in the late 1990s to weather the Asian financial crisis. This close government nexus means Petronas’ fortunes directly affect national finances. In 2008, Petronas paid a record RM67.6 billion dividend to the government, which astonishingly amounted to 44% of federal government revenue that year(en.wikipedia.org). Historically, oil and gas-related receipts (including Petronas contributions) made up as much as 40% of Malaysia’s government revenue in 2009(iseas.edu.sg). Although this reliance has since moderated – dropping to about 19% of government revenue by 2021(iseas.edu.sg) – Petronas remains an indispensable source of income for the nation.

Petronas in the Federal Budget and Consolidated Revenue

We have spoken briefly about the historical role that Petronas has played within the federal budget, and in this section, we will focus on more recent developments. 

Petronas’ role in the federal budget is significant and multifaceted. Being wholly government-owned, Petronas regularly pays large dividends into the government’s coffers, and it also contributes via petroleum income taxes and royalties. 

These revenues flow into Malaysia’s Consolidated Fund, specifically the Consolidated Revenue Account, which is the main pot of government income used to finance public expenditures. 

“Consolidated revenue” refers to the total annual income received by the federal government from all sources combined – including tax revenues (like income taxes, sales tax, etc.) and non-tax revenues (like dividends from Petronas, licenses, and fees). 

In other words, it is the aggregate pool of funds available to the government for budget spending in a given year. Petronas’ payments, alongside other receipts, are part of this consolidated revenue and thus help fund government operations, development projects, education, healthcare, subsidies and so on, according to the allocations of each year’s budget.

Over the past five years, Malaysia’s government revenue has fluctuated, and Petronas has often been a swing factor. 

Below we provide a breakdown of the major federal revenue sources for each year 2019–2023, in descending order of magnitude, highlighting where Petronas stands among them. This illustrates how critical Petronas’ contributions (primarily as dividends) have been relative to other revenue streams.

2019: Revenue Sources in Descending Order

2019 was a high-revenue year, boosted by an extraordinary RM30 billion special dividend from Petronas (on top of its normal dividend) that the government requested to settle outstanding tax refunds(theedgemalaysia.com). That special payment helped push Petronas’s total dividend to RM54 billion in 2019(en.wikipedia.org), an all-time high. The table below shows 2019’s largest revenue sources:

Revenue SourceAmount (RM billion)
Company Income Tax (corporate profits)63.8
Petronas Dividend (incl. special)54.0
Individual Income Tax38.7
Sales and Services Tax (SST)27.7
Petroleum Income Tax (PITA)20.8
Licenses & Permits (incl. oil royalties)~14.5

Sources: In 2019, corporate income tax was the single largest revenue source (about RM63.8 billion)(assets.kpmg.com). 

Thanks to the one-off injection, Petronas became the second-largest contributor to Malaysia’s revenue in 2019 – its RM54 billion dividend comprised roughly 20% of total government income(en.wikipedia.org). Individual income taxes (RM38.7 billion) were the third-biggest source, followed by the SST consumption tax (RM27.7 billion)(malaymail.com). Petroleum income tax – a profit tax on oil & gas operators – contributed around RM20.8 billion(assets.kpmg.com). Non-tax revenues from licenses and permits (which include petroleum royalties paid to the federal government) added another ~RM14.5 billion(malaymail.com). 

In sum, oil-related receipts (Petronas dividends + petroleum taxes/royalties) formed a large chunk of 2019’s revenue – It was truly Malaysia’s cash cow. 

To view this content, please sign up for a membership!

If you haven’t signed up yet, make sure to Join Now!
Already a member? Log in here

Bank Negara Malaysia and the Architecture of Malaysia’s Financial Statecraft

Victor Tan
 

Economics is not finance, finance is not economics. 

We know this to be true. 

Yet we see how they rhyme with one another in interesting, subtle and layered ways. 

In this piece, we will dive into the very first of our institution reports – an institution that is extremely important to Malaysia, both its present and its future. 

Let’s go!

The Architecture of Financial Statecraft: Bank Negara’s Holistic Role

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) – Malaysia’s central bank – stands at the intersection of economics and finance, exercising a form of financial statecraft that has been instrumental in the nation’s development. 

Established on January 26, 1959, just over a year after independence, BNM was created to issue Malaysia’s currency and to safeguard monetary and financial stability.[1] 

Over the decades, its mandate has expanded into a comprehensive stewardship of the country’s financial system. Unlike a narrow focus on inflation or interest rates alone, Malaysia’s central bank operates with a broad toolkit that bridges macroeconomic policy and financial sector development.

At its core, BNM’s primary objectives are to promote monetary stability (keeping prices stable and inflation low) and financial stability (ensuring a safe, sound banking system), both of which are seen as prerequisites for sustainable economic growth.[2] But the “architecture” of Malaysia’s financial statecraft involves much more than setting the overnight policy interest rate. The central bank wears multiple hats in orchestrating the financial system:

  • Monetary Authority: BNM sets the nation’s key interest rate (the Overnight Policy Rate) to influence borrowing costs, credit expansion, and economic activity. Through open market operations and other tools, it manages liquidity and guides inflation expectations. For instance, since the adoption of an explicit policy rate framework in 2004, BNM has adjusted rates in response to economic conditions (e.g. cutting rates aggressively during the 2008–09 global financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic, then raising them as recovery took hold).[3] Its record of maintaining moderate inflation (typically in the low single digits) underscores a commitment to price stability on par with advanced peers.
  • Banker, Advisor, and Debt Manager to Government: By law, Bank Negara is the banker and financial adviser to the Malaysian government.[1] It manages the issuance of government securities and helps coordinate fiscal and monetary policy. When Malaysia funds development projects or runs deficits, BNM plays a crucial role in ensuring those financing needs are met in an orderly fashion. In practice, this means conducting auctions of Malaysian Government Securities, advising on debt strategies, and sometimes purchasing government bonds in secondary markets to ensure market stability (as it did briefly during periods of stress).
  • Regulator and Supervisor of the Financial System: BNM acts as the chief regulatory architect of Malaysia’s financial sector. It licenses and supervises commercial banks, Islamic banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions, enforcing prudential standards to maintain solvency and integrity. The bank is empowered by comprehensive legislation – such as the Financial Services Act 2013 and Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 – to set the rules of the game for finance.[4] This includes prescribing capital adequacy ratios for banks, curbing excessive risk-taking, and protecting consumers. For example, in the mid-2010s BNM imposed macroprudential limits (like a cap on loan-to-value ratios for multiple home mortgages) to rein in surging household debt and speculative property lending.[5] These measures, alongside responsible lending guidelines, reflect BNM’s proactive use of regulatory levers to preempt financial instability.
  • Guardian of the Payment System: In today’s economy, the plumbing of finance – payment networks, clearing and settlement systems – is critical. BNM oversees both traditional payment systems (like the Real-time Electronic Transfer of Funds and Securities, RENTAS) and fosters innovation in digital payments. It formulates regulatory frameworks and standards for electronic payments, ensuring they are efficient and secure.[6] Under BNM’s watch, Malaysia has developed one of Southeast Asia’s most advanced payment infrastructures, including a national QR code standard (DuitNow) that enables instant fund transfers and e-wallet interoperability. The central bank’s oversight gives the public and businesses confidence that they can transact smoothly, a linchpin for commerce.
  • Manager of the Nation’s Reserves and Currency Value: BNM manages Malaysia’s international reserves – which stood at about US$118 billion as of early 2025 – to ensure adequate buffers against external shocks and to support the value of the Malaysian ringgit.[7] Through interventions in the foreign exchange market, the central bank can smooth excessive volatility in the ringgit’s exchange rate. Notably, BNM has used both orthodox and unorthodox tactics in different eras to defend the currency. It maintains a managed float exchange rate regime today, where the ringgit’s value is market-determined but the bank may intervene during disruptive swings. This role has been crucial in maintaining investor confidence and external stability, especially for a trade-dependent nation like Malaysia.
  • Lender of Last Resort: A less visible but vital function, BNM serves as the lender of last resort to the banking system. In times of crisis or bank runs, it can extend emergency liquidity to banks to prevent a collapse of confidence. This backstop underpins public trust that their deposits are safe. For example, during the Asian Financial Crisis and the Global Financial Crisis, BNM’s readiness to inject liquidity (and the establishment of blanket deposit guarantees in 1998) helped stabilize the system when panic could have taken hold.[8]

Together, these roles illustrate how Bank Negara acts not just as an economic policymaker but as the architect of Malaysia’s financial system, shaping the rules, norms, and structures within which financial activity unfolds. This is financial statecraft in action: using financial policy instruments strategically to achieve national objectives. Under BNM’s guidance, Malaysia’s financial landscape has grown from rudimentary beginnings to a diversified, modern system encompassing conventional and Islamic finance, large domestic banks with regional footprints, and vibrant capital markets. Crucially, the central bank’s approach has always been “holistic” – recognizing that interest rates, banking regulations, payment networks, and human capital development in finance are interconnected pieces of the puzzle. By aligning these elements, Bank Negara Malaysia has sought to harmonize the rhythms of economics and finance, as the opening lines allude, in the service of the nation’s progress.

An Institution at the Heart of Malaysia’s Development 

Beyond its statutory duties, Bank Negara has long seen itself as an instrument of national development. Malaysia’s post-colonial leaders understood that building a robust financial system was essential to economic growth and the wellbeing of its citizens. Thus, BNM’s mission has extended into nurturing the financial sector and talent pool in ways that few central banks globally attempt, blurring the line between financial policy and developmental economics.

One major area is talent development and knowledge-building. BNM not only employs and trains a large cadre of its own economists, bankers, and supervisors; it has also invested in educating the broader ecosystem of financial professionals and future leaders. The bank offers prestigious scholarships each year to high-achieving young Malaysians to pursue studies in economics, finance, and related fields at top universities, on the condition that they return and serve with the Bank or contribute to the nation.[9] This scholarship programme – dating back decades – has quietly shaped a generation of policy makers and financial industry leaders. Many of its scholars have gone on to influential roles within BNM and other key institutions, ensuring a continuous infusion of expertise into Malaysia’s financial governance.

Perhaps the most ambitious example of BNM’s commitment to human capital is the establishment of the Asia School of Business (ASB) in Kuala Lumpur. 

In 2015, under the leadership of Governor Zeti Akhtar Aziz, Bank Negara Malaysia partnered with the MIT Sloan School of Management to found ASB, a new world-class business school.[10] The Asia School of Business, which welcomed its first MBA students in 2016, combines MIT’s rigor with hands-on exposure to Asian markets. It was conceived as a response to the need for top-tier managerial talent in Malaysia and the region – effectively a “central bank’s business school” aimed at producing future CEOs, entrepreneurs, and policy shapers. Not only did BNM provide the initial endowment and campus (even locating it next to the central bank’s Sasana Kijang learning center), but Governor Zeti herself became co-chair of ASB’s board after retiring from the bank.[11] This unusual venture reflects BNM’s view that a sophisticated financial system ultimately depends on a pipeline of skilled, innovative people. ASB’s curriculum places heavy emphasis on action learning with companies in ASEAN, aligning with BNM’s vision to bridge academic theory and real-world practice in finance and business.[10]

BNM has also set up or supported a host of other institutions for capacity-building in finance. In 2003 it created the ICLIF Leadership and Governance Centre, dedicated to training corporate and public-sector leaders in good governance and strategic management. In 2006, it established the International Centre for Education in Islamic Finance (INCEIF), now a university that develops specialists in Islamic banking and finance – an area where Malaysia has become a global leader (more on this shortly). These centers, alongside BNM’s own training academy and regular seminars, have turned Kuala Lumpur into something of an intellectual hub for central banking and finance in the region.

Another developmental thrust has been financial inclusion and literacy. Bank Negara has worked to broaden access to financial services for Malaysians from all walks of life, under the principle that an inclusive financial system supports socioeconomic development. In practice, this meant encouraging the expansion of bank branches and services beyond urban centers, and when brick-and-mortar banking reached its limits, enabling agent banking and digital finance solutions. By the 2010s, BNM introduced frameworks allowing banks to appoint local retail shops or post offices as agents to offer basic banking (deposits, withdrawals, bill payments) in rural areas. The results have been striking: Malaysia’s financial inclusion metrics – such as the percentage of adults with a bank account – are among the highest in emerging Asia (well over 90%).[12] Through initiatives like the National Strategy for Financial Literacy 2019-2023, co-led by BNM, the bank has also promoted public understanding of finance, from teaching schoolchildren the importance of saving to running a state-of-the-art Money Museum and Financial Gallery at its headquarters. All these efforts are part of crafting an ecosystem where ordinary citizens can participate in and benefit from the financial system safely.

Bank Negara’s developmental role also involves market development and innovation. The bank has been pivotal in building Malaysia’s domestic capital markets – for example, helping to launch the local bond market in the 1980s and 90s, and supporting the creation of institutions like the Securities Commission in 1993 to regulate those markets. In the 2000s, BNM championed Islamic finance as a dual system alongside conventional finance. It granted licenses to Islamic banks and takaful (Islamic insurance) operators, developed Shariah governance standards, and pushed for Islamic financial instruments. Thanks in large part to these policies, Malaysia today has the world’s largest sukuk (Islamic bond) market and a thriving Islamic banking sector capturing around 30% of total banking assets. This is a clear example of Bank Negara using financial statecraft to achieve a strategic national goal: positioning Malaysia as a global Islamic finance center, which diversifies the financial sector and reinforces the country’s Muslim-majority identity in the economic sphere.[13]

Crucially, BNM’s influence extends into the broader policy sphere. The central bank often works in concert with the government’s economic plans, while maintaining an arm’s-length independence in its core decisions. 

It has been said that Bank Negara provides the “long-term memory” in Malaysian economic management – its leaders, armed with data and analysis, have not shied from advising government leaders on what needs to be done for sustainable growth, even if politically difficult. For example, BNM has periodically sounded the alarm on issues like high household debt and housing affordability, prompting fiscal authorities to adjust policies (such as tightening mortgage lending rules or introducing housing schemes). 

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, BNM moved swiftly to mitigate economic damage by slashing interest rates to historic lows and coordinating an automatic six-month loan moratorium with the banking industry to give relief to borrowers.[14] While unorthodox, this massive moratorium (which was later extended in targeted ways) helped tide over households and small businesses, and was credited with preventing a sharper economic collapse. It exemplified how BNM’s actions intersected with social policy, as the bank recognized the extraordinary shock to livelihoods and crafted a financial solution to cushion it.

In sum, Bank Negara Malaysia is not a cloistered central bank concerned only with charts and rates; it is a central institution in Malaysia’s business, political, and social ecosystem. Its policies on banking and credit affect the day-to-day life of entrepreneurs trying to get loans, families buying homes, students seeking scholarships, and investors domestic or foreign. The bank’s leadership has often been drawn into national conversations on economic direction, from industrialization strategies in earlier decades to today’s debates on digital economy and climate change. And because of its reputation for professionalism, BNM has at times been one of the most trusted public institutions in Malaysia – perceived as relatively technocratic and insulated from politics, even as it works closely with politicians in formulating policy. This trust was hard-earned and has been tested occasionally (as we will see in historical episodes), but it remains a key asset: people generally believe that Bank Negara “has Malaysia’s back” when it comes to financial matters.

To appreciate how BNM came to assume such a multifaceted and respected role, one must look at the history and evolution of the institution. The bank’s character has been shaped by economic trials by fire – from the turbulent early years of nationhood, through boom and bust cycles, financial crises, and transformations in the global financial landscape. 

In the narrative that follows (available to our Premium members), we trace Bank Negara’s journey through time in a historical jaunt through time as we look through the history of the central bank throughout the eras., highlighting how each era and each Governor left a distinct imprint on Malaysia’s financial statecraft.

The History and Legacy of Bank Negara

To view this content, please sign up for a membership!

If you haven’t signed up yet, make sure to Join Now!
Already a member? Log in here